rickw
Junior Member
Joined: November 2018
Posts: 73
|
Post by rickw on Dec 16, 2019 12:49:31 GMT -5
Has anybody experimented with lengthening the pipe from flame tube to the turbo in an effort to cool the gasses a bit? I was thinking of trying to snake the pipe around to create distance from the flame tube to the turbine as well as making a more axial appearance instead of having a flame tube sticking out like a sore thumb at 90 degrees.
|
|
|
Post by racket on Dec 16, 2019 15:31:42 GMT -5
NO NO NO ..........why heat the gases only to cool them from lotsa surface area on a delivery tube , as well as a loss of energy from all the extra friction , the sore thumb combustor is "efficient" .
A cool running turbine engine is a whimpy engine , turbines are designed to run at temperatures that the turbine wheel just survives at , not too hot , not too cold , just right .
|
|
rickw
Junior Member
Joined: November 2018
Posts: 73
|
Post by rickw on Dec 16, 2019 18:49:12 GMT -5
I've seen cars that run the turbo at the back of the car and it works well. Wouldn't cooler denser air drive the turbine better?
|
|
|
Post by racket on Dec 16, 2019 19:45:38 GMT -5
Nope , cooler gases have LESS energy , virtually all turbochargers on SI engines have too much hot gas energy going to the turbo, so some loss of energy isn't a problem , it just means the wastegate doesn't open as much .
|
|
rickw
Junior Member
Joined: November 2018
Posts: 73
|
Post by rickw on Dec 16, 2019 20:23:41 GMT -5
I'm getting EGT OF 1100F TO 1300F. Is that ok?
|
|
|
Post by racket on Dec 16, 2019 22:37:09 GMT -5
Fine :-)
|
|
rickw
Junior Member
Joined: November 2018
Posts: 73
|
Post by rickw on Dec 17, 2019 11:24:19 GMT -5
Thanks again kind sir.
|
|