Post by racket on Mar 11, 2016 17:07:26 GMT -5
Hi Anders .
Yep , its nice to finally have bits bolted together rather spread around the workshop .
Whilst I've been waiting for the O'ring I got to thinking about freepower wheels for the engine , up till now I've more or less felt I'd have to use a C30 4th stage wheel as the flow is ~50% more than our TV94 based engines, but maybe the "common" C20 4th stage wheel will work .............heres my "rational??" thinking on this .
The C20 engine flows ~3.6 lbs/sec which is the same as the 12/118 engine ............off to a good start here :-)
The C20 turns out 420 HP from its two freepower stages , one would assume an equal division of work between the two stages , so 210 HP for the C20 4th stage wheel .
Now the calcs for the 12/118 gives at least 250 HP , therefore I must have more "energy" available going into the turb stage than the C20 has going into its 4th stage .
More energy means more gas velocity , so I should be able to get the same mass flow through the same stage flow areas if a C20 4th stage NGV is used with the C20 4th stage wheel .
Up to now I've always wondered why the 4th stage C20 NGV appeared to have an "oversized" NGV flow area of ~14 sq inches when the wheel only has ~15 sq inches , but it appears as though the stage is proportioned more for cruise efficiency than 102% takeoff power , at takeoff theres could be considerable "inefficient" swirl in the wheels exhaust gases,.......... N2 is kept constant between takeoff and cruise regardless of N1 power setting.
From my reverse engineering of the C20 freepower stages it appears as though they only have a PR of less than 1.5 :1 across each stage , whereas I should have 1.7 :1 out of the 12/118 .
It would mean some increased blade loading on the C20 wheel compared to the bigger C30 , but as both wheel look almost identical other than the longer blading on the C30 ,which would increase tensile loading on the blade roots and hub, we might just get away with it .
Cheers
John
Yep , its nice to finally have bits bolted together rather spread around the workshop .
Whilst I've been waiting for the O'ring I got to thinking about freepower wheels for the engine , up till now I've more or less felt I'd have to use a C30 4th stage wheel as the flow is ~50% more than our TV94 based engines, but maybe the "common" C20 4th stage wheel will work .............heres my "rational??" thinking on this .
The C20 engine flows ~3.6 lbs/sec which is the same as the 12/118 engine ............off to a good start here :-)
The C20 turns out 420 HP from its two freepower stages , one would assume an equal division of work between the two stages , so 210 HP for the C20 4th stage wheel .
Now the calcs for the 12/118 gives at least 250 HP , therefore I must have more "energy" available going into the turb stage than the C20 has going into its 4th stage .
More energy means more gas velocity , so I should be able to get the same mass flow through the same stage flow areas if a C20 4th stage NGV is used with the C20 4th stage wheel .
Up to now I've always wondered why the 4th stage C20 NGV appeared to have an "oversized" NGV flow area of ~14 sq inches when the wheel only has ~15 sq inches , but it appears as though the stage is proportioned more for cruise efficiency than 102% takeoff power , at takeoff theres could be considerable "inefficient" swirl in the wheels exhaust gases,.......... N2 is kept constant between takeoff and cruise regardless of N1 power setting.
From my reverse engineering of the C20 freepower stages it appears as though they only have a PR of less than 1.5 :1 across each stage , whereas I should have 1.7 :1 out of the 12/118 .
It would mean some increased blade loading on the C20 wheel compared to the bigger C30 , but as both wheel look almost identical other than the longer blading on the C30 ,which would increase tensile loading on the blade roots and hub, we might just get away with it .
Cheers
John