Post by Feathers on Jan 12, 2013 13:38:52 GMT -5
Brainwave
You've all heard of the "airzookas" and the vortex-generators they make out of trash cans and some canvas, but that all bores me a bit...
I found this video awhile ago:
I was amazed and fascinated, and immediately found the full BBC "Bang Goes the Theory" episode.
It looked like some very sophisticated valves and equipment on the combustion chamber, and I began to doubt that the "clever, but not that clever" host built it himself.
Further digging revealed that the device in the video is actually a prototype "anti-hail shockwave cannon" built by Newton Systems International llc
Youtube is chalk-full of videos of these "shockwave cannons"
Here you can see an old commercial hail cannon firing a powerful, fast-moving vortex ring across a field, making a very distinct screaming/whistling noise.
The manufacturers assume ignorance on the part of their agricultural customers, and claim that the whistling/screaming is a "shockwave", which it clearly (check the slow-mo's on the first video) is not. Its a vortex ring moving at such speed, and with such a fast-moving internal flows that it makes noise.
All this, I found about 6 months before building my first piston-valve air cannon.
I am a believer.
This valve works wonders, and before I shot anything, I did some dry-shots with a 2, and 3 inch barrel.
Upon blasting it into the backyard at ~80 PSI with the 3" barrel, I heard that familiar screaming/whistling noise.
This indicated to me that the shape of the barrel, and the sharp, explosion-like release of air had aligned to form a fast-moving, audible vortex flying across my backyard.
I was thrilled, and immediately bought some 4" PVC and made a barrel which "stepped-up" from 2-3-4" over about 10" length, then a 2 foot 4" barrel.
You'll notice that the air tank is shorter, I built the barrel last week, and shortened the tank just yesterday for reasons I will discuss.
With this new barrel the cannon would, 2/3 times, produce the whistling vortex. However, when I tried to direct the vortex at something, it would veer off- course and take a different route across the backyard.
I also noticed that there is a "sweet spot" around 80 PSI. Much lower, and the vortex would not whistle, and travel slowly. Much higher than 80 and vortecies become more hit-and-miss, then at around 100 PSI I get nothing more than the normal "BANG".
Lesson learned, I decided to take a tip from the "big guns".
I looked at a picture of a commercial hail cannon, and scaled the barrel to a size which "seemed about right" given the size of my cannon. This turned out to be a 40" conical tapered barrel with a 7.5" major diameter, and a 1.8" minor diameter.
I proceeded to carve a big foam form out of pink insulation foam, cover it with clear packing tape, and then 3 coats of silicone-based mold release agent (it looked like a big pink parking cone)
I set a 2" thread-to-pipe PVC coupler over the top (to be fiberglassed into the Assembly), and fiberglassed the whole thing. Here is the result:
To get the form out of the finished part, I just screwed it onto the air-cannon, filled it up to ~20 PSI, and fired it out .
This new barrel worked great, and I was now creating powerful, audible, vortecies repeatedly, and with reasonable accuracy all the way up to ~90 PSI.
However, I'm still hitting some sort of barrier regarding it's performance.
I've done some testing (videos to come!) by filling the barrel with smoke from a fog machine, and filming the shot (focusing on the end of the barrel, and 4-5 feet past that) with my Go Pro HD Hero at 60 frames per second, and analyzing it frame by frame.
It looks to me that a contributing factor may be the increased volume of air leaving the barrel at ~100 PSI, which is actually interrupting the stable formation of the vortex.
Looking at the slow-mo's on the first video (BBC's "Bang Goes the Theory"), I see a vortex leave, and then a little bit of flame, but not much more exits the barrel. On my slow-motion analysis of the ~100 PSI shots however, I see the vortex leave, but in the midst of a giant, turbulent plume of air (visualized by the fog).
For this reason, I shortened the air tank, hoping to retain the "bang", or spike of pressure that the acetylene/oxygen hail cannons use to form a vortex, but reduce the amount of gas that folows.
Video of the more successful tests at 100 PSI with the shorter tank:
You've all heard of the "airzookas" and the vortex-generators they make out of trash cans and some canvas, but that all bores me a bit...
I found this video awhile ago:
I was amazed and fascinated, and immediately found the full BBC "Bang Goes the Theory" episode.
It looked like some very sophisticated valves and equipment on the combustion chamber, and I began to doubt that the "clever, but not that clever" host built it himself.
Further digging revealed that the device in the video is actually a prototype "anti-hail shockwave cannon" built by Newton Systems International llc
Youtube is chalk-full of videos of these "shockwave cannons"
Here you can see an old commercial hail cannon firing a powerful, fast-moving vortex ring across a field, making a very distinct screaming/whistling noise.
The manufacturers assume ignorance on the part of their agricultural customers, and claim that the whistling/screaming is a "shockwave", which it clearly (check the slow-mo's on the first video) is not. Its a vortex ring moving at such speed, and with such a fast-moving internal flows that it makes noise.
All this, I found about 6 months before building my first piston-valve air cannon.
I am a believer.
This valve works wonders, and before I shot anything, I did some dry-shots with a 2, and 3 inch barrel.
Upon blasting it into the backyard at ~80 PSI with the 3" barrel, I heard that familiar screaming/whistling noise.
This indicated to me that the shape of the barrel, and the sharp, explosion-like release of air had aligned to form a fast-moving, audible vortex flying across my backyard.
I was thrilled, and immediately bought some 4" PVC and made a barrel which "stepped-up" from 2-3-4" over about 10" length, then a 2 foot 4" barrel.
You'll notice that the air tank is shorter, I built the barrel last week, and shortened the tank just yesterday for reasons I will discuss.
With this new barrel the cannon would, 2/3 times, produce the whistling vortex. However, when I tried to direct the vortex at something, it would veer off- course and take a different route across the backyard.
I also noticed that there is a "sweet spot" around 80 PSI. Much lower, and the vortex would not whistle, and travel slowly. Much higher than 80 and vortecies become more hit-and-miss, then at around 100 PSI I get nothing more than the normal "BANG".
Lesson learned, I decided to take a tip from the "big guns".
I looked at a picture of a commercial hail cannon, and scaled the barrel to a size which "seemed about right" given the size of my cannon. This turned out to be a 40" conical tapered barrel with a 7.5" major diameter, and a 1.8" minor diameter.
I proceeded to carve a big foam form out of pink insulation foam, cover it with clear packing tape, and then 3 coats of silicone-based mold release agent (it looked like a big pink parking cone)
I set a 2" thread-to-pipe PVC coupler over the top (to be fiberglassed into the Assembly), and fiberglassed the whole thing. Here is the result:
To get the form out of the finished part, I just screwed it onto the air-cannon, filled it up to ~20 PSI, and fired it out .
This new barrel worked great, and I was now creating powerful, audible, vortecies repeatedly, and with reasonable accuracy all the way up to ~90 PSI.
However, I'm still hitting some sort of barrier regarding it's performance.
I've done some testing (videos to come!) by filling the barrel with smoke from a fog machine, and filming the shot (focusing on the end of the barrel, and 4-5 feet past that) with my Go Pro HD Hero at 60 frames per second, and analyzing it frame by frame.
It looks to me that a contributing factor may be the increased volume of air leaving the barrel at ~100 PSI, which is actually interrupting the stable formation of the vortex.
Looking at the slow-mo's on the first video (BBC's "Bang Goes the Theory"), I see a vortex leave, and then a little bit of flame, but not much more exits the barrel. On my slow-motion analysis of the ~100 PSI shots however, I see the vortex leave, but in the midst of a giant, turbulent plume of air (visualized by the fog).
For this reason, I shortened the air tank, hoping to retain the "bang", or spike of pressure that the acetylene/oxygen hail cannons use to form a vortex, but reduce the amount of gas that folows.
Video of the more successful tests at 100 PSI with the shorter tank: