|
Post by racket on Dec 12, 2014 20:09:59 GMT -5
Hi Mitch
As long as the accuracy is there you'll be able to tune her for best power :-)
Cheers John
|
|
mitch
Senior Member
Joined: August 2014
Posts: 285
|
Post by mitch on Dec 13, 2014 1:03:05 GMT -5
Yep! there is accuracy, the box was a last minute hacked together deal, as I didn't feel like going to the store to buy a larger box to fit all the pieces in, and I had lost the screws to hold it together, which is why I resorted to using electrical tape lol
|
|
mitch
Senior Member
Joined: August 2014
Posts: 285
|
Post by mitch on Dec 13, 2014 1:08:56 GMT -5
Went to the turbo store to find a turbine for the free power section Tacking the mounting strips onto the evaporator/ flametube base for holes to be drilled Welded the strip onto the flametube, and bolted it to the evap/ flametube base (with nuts welded to the inside)
|
|
|
Post by racket on Dec 13, 2014 2:26:40 GMT -5
Hi Mitch
Nice before and after pic there :-)
Cheers John
|
|
mitch
Senior Member
Joined: August 2014
Posts: 285
|
Post by mitch on Dec 14, 2014 19:15:10 GMT -5
Time to finish the evaporator system, and with the information given by racket, I did some math to find the correct evap tube length and runner / branch length. (All math was done using the inner diameter of the piping being used) With a .76 ID pipe as my evap main tube, I will use a length of 5.5". For the three branches/runners, I will be using .5" ID tubing, with a length of 3.53". This will create branches that are 70% of the length of the main tube, which is almost exactly the same ratio used by RCDon. I chose to use this ratio because it was proven to work fairly well for him.
|
|
|
Post by racket on Dec 14, 2014 19:23:02 GMT -5
Hi Mitch
I don't like "trunk and branch" evaporators , theres always the possibility that there will be bias flow from the branches resulting in uneven combustion across the flametubes cross section, especially if the trunk is horizontal , not so bad if vertical .
Cheers John
|
|
mitch
Senior Member
Joined: August 2014
Posts: 285
|
Post by mitch on Dec 14, 2014 21:08:33 GMT -5
racket, what other type of evaporator would be possible to create?
|
|
|
Post by racket on Dec 14, 2014 21:25:39 GMT -5
Hi Mitch
Have 3 separate evaporators , with fuel fed separately into each , that way there can't be any biasing .
Cheers John
|
|
mitch
Senior Member
Joined: August 2014
Posts: 285
|
Post by mitch on Dec 17, 2014 13:01:31 GMT -5
Got one of the branches welded to the trunk, had to end up going with the trunk and branch type design, as it is the simplest way to go, and I did not accommodate room for 3 individual evaporators in my mounting baseplate.
|
|
|
Post by racket on Dec 17, 2014 13:16:11 GMT -5
Hi Mitch
As long as the combustor is vertical it should be OK .
With a trunk and branch arrangement the limiting flow area is the trunk inlet which needs to be ~10% of total hole area/inducer area , the airflow speeds in the branches will be considerably slower if they are relatively large in diameter and some biasing could occur.
Cheers John
|
|
mitch
Senior Member
Joined: August 2014
Posts: 285
|
Post by mitch on Dec 17, 2014 14:37:28 GMT -5
racket, I made the inlet area about 10% of the total hole area, so I am okay in that area. However, I had planned on making the combustion chamber lay horizontally. Will I run into many problems with a branch arrangement and a horizontal combustion chamber?
|
|
|
Post by racket on Dec 17, 2014 17:43:32 GMT -5
Hi Mitch
If you use a spray nozzle to supply fuel into the evaporator trunk like RC Don did , you probably won't have a problem , but if you use a solid jet of fuel ejected against the wall of trunk it could run to the bottom and go out one branch, ............even with the spray nozzle it could "wet" the wall to such an extent that it will puddle to the bottom of the trunk and behave the same as the solid jet of fuel, thats why I don't like trunk and branch systems , too many possibilities for problems .
Cheers John
|
|
mitch
Senior Member
Joined: August 2014
Posts: 285
|
Post by mitch on Dec 17, 2014 18:35:28 GMT -5
Racket, I will be using a "misting" nozzle that is rated at 14.5 gph flow at 100psi. My fuel pump maxes out at 100 psi, so I plan to run it around 50-70 psi to keep the internal temp of the pump down. In my previous short runs I didn't have any pooling problems running at 10 psi fuel pressure with a 4.5 gph nozzle. But with the larger nozzle and increased fuel pressures we'll have to see what Will happen!
|
|
|
Post by racket on Dec 17, 2014 19:26:40 GMT -5
Hi Mitch
Yep , thats R and D , or should it be the other way around D estroy and R epair :-)
Just be careful not to restrict airflow into the evaporator by having the injection nozzle tip too close , no closer than approx. 1/3rd the evap bore diameter, so no closer than ~ 0.25 inch
Cheers John
|
|
mitch
Senior Member
Joined: August 2014
Posts: 285
|
Post by mitch on Dec 19, 2014 14:35:12 GMT -5
Got the evap assembly pretty much complete other than the top "plug" I'll have to weld in place It came out alright, all the branches are fairly close to each other in dimensions, except one is about .20" longer than the other two. I am hoping that the amount of errors between the three is enough to even out the flow, not too worried about it though.
|
|